Choose the Threat or Play it Safe? Planning for Resilient Marine Protected Areas in the Sulu-Sulawesi Marine Ecoregion [/et_pb_text][/et_pb_column][/et_pb_row][et_pb_row make_fullwidth=”on” _builder_version=”3.12.2″ custom_padding=”3px|0px|0|0px|false|false”][et_pb_column type=”2_3″ _builder_version=”3.12.2″ parallax=”off” parallax_method=”on”][et_pb_text _builder_version=”3.12.2″]
Pei Ya Boon
University Of East AngliaAuthors
Boon Pei Ya, Maria Beger
Increasingly, marine protected areas (MPAs) are designed for the purpose of maintaining ecological resilience. In this study, we use the case of the Sulu Sulawesi Marine Ecoregion to investigate how conservation priorities differ (i) between single threats and integrated threats; and (ii) for two different management strategies, targeting or avoiding high threat areas for protection.
The software MARXAN was used with a target to include 20% of each habitat while minimizing the opportunity costs as represented by foregone artisanal fish catch and foregone access to the mangroves using the global human footprint as a proxy. Three types of threats were considered: coastal development, marine pollution and watershed pollution. MARXAN was implemented for seven scenarios and cluster analysis was conducted on the selection frequencies in R.
Mangroves and shallow coral reefs were the least protected by current reserves. The single threat-averse scenarios for coastal development and marine pollution produced the most similar solutions, followed by the integrated threat-averse scenario and the single threat-averse scenarios for watershed pollution. The priority areas for the single threat-tolerant scenario for watershed pollution and integrated threat-tolerant scenarios were the two most costly.
Conservation priorities show the biggest change under consideration of watershed pollution. Mangroves are the least protected habitat but also the most resistant to watershed pollution and may act as a buffer to adjacent habitats. They should be incorporated into MPAs regardless of watershed pollution levels. However the threat-tolerant strategy may be more costly. Nonetheless watershed management should be a priority for the Sulu-Sulawesi Marine Ecoregion.[/et_pb_text][/et_pb_column][et_pb_column type=”1_3″ _builder_version=”3.12.2″ parallax=”off” parallax_method=”on”][/et_pb_column][/et_pb_row][/et_pb_section][et_pb_section fb_built=”1″ admin_label=”Subscribe” _builder_version=”3.12.2″ background_color=”rgba(0,0,0,0.37)” use_background_color_gradient=”on” background_color_gradient_start=”#D883F8″ background_color_gradient_end=”#352DBE” background_color_gradient_direction=”96deg” background_color_gradient_start_position=”29%” background_image=”http://18.104.22.168/~sccs/public_html/wp-content/uploads/2018/09/5-1.jpg” background_blend=”overlay” custom_margin=”|||” custom_padding=”0||0||true|false” global_module=”309″ saved_tabs=”all”][/et_pb_section]]]>